logging-log4j-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Wayne Cannon <wcan...@turinnetworks.com>
Subject Re: Great product like log4j stagnant?
Date Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:29:20 GMT
I heard that too, but it was from the author in response to purchasing 
his log4j documentation -- a reputable, but not exactly unbiased, 
source.  I haven't heard any more about logback from any other source.  
--Wayne

Arthur Blake wrote:
> I thought logback would be the eventual replacement of log4j...
>
> http://logback.qos.ch/
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Wayne Cannon <wcannon@turinnetworks.com>
> To: Log4J Users List <log4j-user@logging.apache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2007 11:43:28 AM
> Subject: Great product like log4j stagnant?
>
> In a different thread, Steve Souza said that log4j development had 
> stagnated (my words, not his, re version 1.3).  Is this true?  If this 
> is true, is it simply because log4j is a mature product and is a good 
> product needing little ongoing development effort of significance, or is 
> there a new/replacement product carrying the de facto logging charter 
> into the future (e.g. compatible with commons-logging)?
>
> Respectfully,
> Wayne
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>       ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles. Visit the Yahoo!
Auto Green Center.
> http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/ 
>   

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org


Mime
View raw message