logging-log4j-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Steve Souza" <jamon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Logging - What good is it ?
Date Tue, 05 Jun 2007 09:54:03 GMT
ok, I see in this class structure the receiver, but not the
SocketReceiver.

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4j/companions/component/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/log4j/

Will this mailing list be notified when log4j 1.2.15 is released?

On 6/5/07, Curt Arnold <carnold@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 4, 2007, at 7:44 PM, Steve Souza wrote:
>
> > <<log4j 1.3 development is effectively abandoned.  Much of the traffic
> > on the log4j-dev list since early April has dealt with the fate of
> > log4j 1.3.>>
> > Not sure who controls the website, but that direction should be
> > updated on
> > the site as currently it indicates log4j 1.3 is the future.  Not
> > everyone is
> > on this mailing list.
>
> A total reworking of the online content is in-progress.  All the
> log4j content is expected to be replaced after the completion of the
> log4j 1.2.15 vote.
>
>
> >
> > <<SocketReceiver is part of the "receivers" companion.  I'm just in
> > the
> > process of migrating the companions from
> > the sandbox to the log4j repo and should have a release candidate in
> > a day or so.  >>
> > Where is the sandbox code kept?
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/sandbox
>
> All the companions that are currently expected to be considered
> alongside log4j 1.2.15 have now been migrated to https://
> svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4j/companions.
>
>
> > Also, will the release you are referring
> > too be available in this link:
> > http://archive.apache.org/dist/logging/log4j/
>
> After the anticipated log4j 1.2.15 vote, all the companions would be
> available at http://www.apache.org/dist/logging/log4j/companions (and
> also at the archive site).  Release candidates should be at  http://
> people.apache.org/builds/logging tomorrow.
>
> >
> > If not what is the proper link to look at the current state of
> > development
> > for the log4j project?
>
> The web content typically reflects the state at the last release and
> in this case is extremely stale since it reflects the expectations at
> the time of the last log4j 1.3 alpha (since the web content for log4j
> is generated from the log4j 1.3 source).  log4j-dev will always be
> the place for the latest news, but the web content should be much
> more current after the switch with the log4j 1.2.15 vote.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message