logging-log4j-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [LOG4J 2] log4j-1.2-api hardcoded against log4j-core?
Date Thu, 07 Nov 2013 13:39:17 GMT
Hi,

Yes, log4j-1.2-api relies on both api-2.0 and core-2.0.

Best regards,
Remko Popma

On Thursday, November 7, 2013, Andreas Magnusson wrote:

> Hi all, I'm currently prototyping a move from our proprietary logging
> framework to log4j 2.0.
> I've taken the route of creating a bridge from our API to log4j-api
> (inspired by log4j-slf4j-impl) and a "server" bridge in the same way (via
> LoggerContextFactory).
>
> I then created a test application that used log4j-api, log4j-slf4j-impl,
> log4j-jcl , jul (through slf4j), log4j-1.2-api and our own api all at once
> to make sure that everything was translated correctly.
> That's when I got the following exception when getting a logger through
> log4j-1.2-api:
> java.lang.ClassCastException: com.example.InternalContext cannot be cast to
> org.apache.logging.log4j.core.LoggerContext
>     at org.apache.log4j.LogManager.getLogger(LogManager.java:77)
>     at com.example.loggingTest.Module.log4jLog(Module.java:71)
>     at com.example.loggingTest.Module.startModule(Module.java:23)
>     at
> com.example.node.application.ModuleLoader$4.run(ModuleLoader.java:735)
>
> Is this by design? The reason I'm asking is that the other bridges (i.e.
> log4j-jcl and log4j-slf4j-impl) are fine with my own defined
> LoggingContext, it's only log4j-1.2-api that has this problem. Of course
> the plan is to use log4j-core as the framework, so it's not that big a deal
> for me personally.
>
> Other than that, great work!
>
> Regards,
> Andreas Magnusson
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message