logging-log4j-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ralph Goers <rgo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Flume Appender
Date Thu, 24 Jul 2014 11:30:52 GMT
Just for clarification, I tested that way because we wanted to insure there would never be
any data loss - which you can have with async appenders and loggers.

Sent from my iPad

> On Jul 24, 2014, at 2:59 AM, jfloviou <jf_guilmard@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm digging out this Thread from December 2012 as i would like to get fresh
> thoughts on these questions.
> 
> Before reading the discussion i was also hesitating between a Flume Embedded
> Agent or a Flume Appender after and Asynch Appender.
> Ralph performance output were very interesting but i feel like he compared
> Embedded agent vs Flume Appender without Asynch, with of course great
> advantage to the Embedded Agent.
> 
> => Did anybody get to the same question and has fresh thoughts on this topic
> ?
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Jeff
> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-logging.6191.n7.nabble.com/Flume-Appender-tp7089p49684.html
> Sent from the Log4j - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org


Mime
View raw message