logging-log4j-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Why is log4net not more similar to log4j(2)?
Date Wed, 16 Sep 2015 22:25:19 GMT
I think I read somewhere that log4net was a port of log4j 1.

"Patches welcome" is my motto :-)

Gary

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Nicholas Duane <nickdu@msn.com> wrote:

> Sending to both the log4j and log4net mailing lists.
>
> I'm curious why log4net is not more similar to log4j(2)?  Is it because
> there is less development work being done on log4net and log4j had
> significant changes in the 2.0 version?  Any chance log4net might become
> more of a "port" of log4j(2) and thus be more similar?
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>




-- 
E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message