logging-log4j-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicholas Duane <nic...@msn.com>
Subject Re: porting log4j2 to .NET
Date Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:59:45 GMT
Thanks for the guess.  I assume there is enough "separate" big enough pieces that a small group
of people could work on different sections without stepping on each others toes such that
you'd get some linear scaling.  For instance, it might take 3 people 2 months?  Even if we
double your estimate, 3 people taking 4 months?  Doesn't sound too bad.



From: Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 8:54 PM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: Re: porting log4j2 to .NET

Random guesstimate for a complete port, including tests (what about docs):
6 man-months. You can shorten things up by reducing appenders and
configuration formats.


On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Nicholas Duane <nickdu@msn.com> wrote:

> Figured I would send this question out to the log4j side.  I have already
> had some email exchanges with the log4net mailing list regarding porting
> log4j2 to .NET.  My suggestion was that the apache logging framework be a
> single architecture design which is platform agnostic and then teams which
> port to the different platforms.  It seems log4net was a port of log4j and
> may be going off in its own direction from that initial port.  My viewpoint
> is that's a bad idea as one of the benefits I saw was that log4net was
> similar to log4j2 and we're looking for logging frameworks for our
> enterprise.  We have applications on both Windows/.NET and Linux/Java so
> having a logging framework for Windows/.NET which is similar to a logging
> framework for Linux/Java was a big plus.
> While I have no doubt the effort to port log4j2 to .NET is considerable,
> it would be a port and thus I'm not spending time figuring out design and
> algorithms.  Would anyone want to venture a guess at what that effort might
> be?
> Thanks,
> Nick

E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition

JUnit in Action, Second Edition
JUnit in Action, Second Edition: Petar Tahchiev, Felipe Leme, Vincent Massol, Gary Gregory:
9781935182023: Amazon.com: Books<https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1935182021/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1935182021&linkCode=as2&tag=garygregory-20&linkId=31ecd1f6b6d1eaf8886ac902a24de418%22>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition [Petar Tahchiev, Felipe Leme, Vincent Massol, Gary Gregory]
on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
When JUnit was first introduced a decade ago by Kent Beck and Erich Gamma, the Agile movement
was in its infancy

Spring Batch in Action
Spring Batch in Action: Arnaud Cogoluegnes, Thierry Templier, Gary Gregory, Olivier Bazoud:
9781935182955: Amazon.com: Books<https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1935182951/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1935182951&linkCode=%7B%7BlinkCode%7D%7D&tag=garygregory-20&linkId=%7B%7Blink_id%7D%7D%22%3ESpring+Batch+in+Action>
Spring Batch in Action [Arnaud Cogoluegnes, Thierry Templier, Gary Gregory, Olivier Bazoud]
on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
Summary Spring Batch in Action is an in-depth guide to writing batch applications using Spring
Batch. Written for developers who have basic knowledge of Java and the Spring lightweight

Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com

Gary Gregory<http://garygregory.wordpress.com/>
Software construction, the web, and other techs

Home: http://garygregory.com/
Gary Gregory<http://garygregory.com/>
Rocket | Seagull . I am a Software Architect for Seagull Software, a division of Rocket Software.
Rocket Seagull specializes in tools and expertise to modernize ...

Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message