logging-log4j-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: porting log4j2 to .NET
Date Tue, 18 Oct 2016 13:58:10 GMT
Using syslog is a pretty standard way to collect logs from all sorts of
programs and goes back decades. There has been an update to the syslog
format in RFC 5424 which fleshes it out a bunch.

Then there are programs like Logstash and Flume which can be used in a more
platform-agnostic manner to collect logs from different applications.

Really, when it comes down to it, the most standard way you can log
everything regardless of programming language is to use log files or some
sort of network appender using a standardized binary format.

On 18 October 2016 at 08:53, Nicholas Duane <nickdu@msn.com> wrote:

> I guess platform is vague.  Maybe I should have said language agnostic.
> It would be nice to have a single logging architecture/design run on C/C++,
> .NET, Java, etc.  Or at least it seems like a nice feature to me.  I would
> assume there are many enterprises out there that have applications running
> on different OS's and languages.  If I'm trying to pick a logging framework
> to use and I find a popular one which is capable and runs similarly across
> the OS's and languages then that's a big plus in my mind.
> Thanks,
> Nick
> ________________________________
> From: Mikael Ståldal <mikael.staldal@magine.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 2:52 AM
> To: Log4J Users List
> Subject: Re: porting log4j2 to .NET
> Just to make things clear, Log4j is a logging framework for the JVM
> platform, and it is agnostic to the underlying OS. It it well tested on (at
> least) both Linux and Windows.
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Nicholas Duane <nickdu@msn.com> wrote:
> > Figured I would send this question out to the log4j side.  I have already
> > had some email exchanges with the log4net mailing list regarding porting
> > log4j2 to .NET.  My suggestion was that the apache logging framework be a
> > single architecture design which is platform agnostic and then teams
> which
> > port to the different platforms.  It seems log4net was a port of log4j
> and
> > may be going off in its own direction from that initial port.  My
> viewpoint
> > is that's a bad idea as one of the benefits I saw was that log4net was
> > similar to log4j2 and we're looking for logging frameworks for our
> > enterprise.  We have applications on both Windows/.NET and Linux/Java so
> > having a logging framework for Windows/.NET which is similar to a logging
> > framework for Linux/Java was a big plus.
> >
> >
> > While I have no doubt the effort to port log4j2 to .NET is considerable,
> > it would be a port and thus I'm not spending time figuring out design and
> > algorithms.  Would anyone want to venture a guess at what that effort
> might
> > be?
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Nick
> >
> --
> [image: MagineTV]
> *Mikael Ståldal*
> Senior software developer
> *Magine TV*
> mikael.staldal@magine.com
> Grev Turegatan 3  | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden  |   www.magine.com<
> http://www.magine.com>
> [https://de.magine.com/content/uploads/2016/09/magine_global_social.png]<
> http://www.magine.com/>
> TV online with Magine TV<http://www.magine.com/>
> www.magine.com
> Watch the TV you love, on any device, anywhere in Germany and Sweden and
> find out more about our global OTT B2B solutions. Get started today.
> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
> message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not
> copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply
> email.

Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com>

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message