logging-log4j-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alex O'Ree" <spyhunte...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: log4j vs log4jextras v1.x
Date Fri, 17 Nov 2017 20:02:27 GMT
Understood, but if I needed log4extras, would I just have just log4extras
on the classpath or (log4jextras and log4j) on the classpath


On Nov 17, 2017 1:36 PM, "Ralph Goers" <ralph.goers@dslextreme.com> wrote:

> Log4jextras was extra stuff for Log4j 1. Log4j 1 is not longer supported
> so neither would be log4jextras.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Nov 17, 2017, at 11:22 AM, Alex O'Ree <alexoree@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry if this has been asked before, but i'm not clear on whether or not
> > log4jextras is a replacement for log4j or an add on?
> >
> > I've running into some issues where they are both in the classpath
> causing
> > a conflict between the Appender interface and am looking for solutions.
> > Thanks!
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message