lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Erik Hatcher" <>
Subject Re: cvs commit: jakarta-lucene build.xml
Date Thu, 28 Feb 2002 03:05:47 GMT
*whew* what a bunch of trouble I stirred up.  I apologize folks.  I'm a firm
believer in getting Ant usage more standardized, its just there is a lot of
competing ways of such "standardization".  Thank you Jon for enlightening me
a bit into your reasons - it has been helpful for my own views.  I actually
like the way you're spelling things out - what I don't like is that it takes
two files to do so and risks a user modifying (because
users don't read documentation anyway, even if it is right at the top of the
file they are editing!).  As an Ant committer, I'm 'committed' to making our
build file world a happier place.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Dmitry Serebrennikov" <>
To: "Lucene Developers List" <>
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-lucene build.xml

> >
> >
> >
> >Ah, you are a committer here, so that -1 definitely has to count (for
> >some reason I thought you were not a commiter and hence didn't take
> >that -1 as seriously). Sorry about that.
> >I'm all for somebody else finishing this business.
> >Will you do it even if people vote not to use your suggestions?
> >
> >Dmitry already gave a +1 for no, which could be a
> >-1.  Dmitry, are you a commiter?  I don't see your name on
> >
> >
> Yes, I'm am a commiter, although my major contribution is still pending
> (support for TermVectors). Hopefully, once the release goes out, I can
> bring my code up to date and commit into the CVS (but this is off topic).
> I voted +1 intentionally, so as not to give a -1 against the other
> option. I'm ok with whatever is decided in other words.
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message