lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dmitry Serebrennikov <>
Subject Re: StrictAnalyzer
Date Wed, 20 Feb 2002 17:32:10 GMT
Hi Alan,

I know at least in my case, I have a much more extensive list of stop 
words and they are simply read from a file into an array and then passed 
to the existing class. Would this approach work in your case? It seemed 
that adding a new class just to have a new set of default stop words was 
not particularly required. It would probably prove to be more confusing 
than anything else. However, there might be an argument for changing the 
default set that is already in the existing class. I had not checked, 
but if the new set is much better than the old one, I'd +1 it.


Alan Weissman wrote:

>devs -
>     Judging by the lack of response to my message yesterday containing some
>ideas for additions and changes I am assuming that there is no interest.  As
>this was my first attempt at open source contribution, could someone explain
>why there is no interest in these types of changes?
>Thanks very much,
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <>

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message