lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Spencer <>
Subject Re: single field code ready - Re: URL to compare 2 Similarity's ready-- Re: Scoring benchmark evaluation. Was RE: How to proceed with Bug 31841 - MultiSearcher problems with Similarity.docFreq() ?
Date Mon, 07 Feb 2005 23:39:21 GMT
Daniel Naber wrote:

> On Tuesday 08 February 2005 00:06, David Spencer wrote:
>>So, does this make sense and is it useful way of trying to evaluate the
> Is this the MultiFieldQueryParser from Lucene 1.4? 

I see WEB-INF/lib/lucene-1.5-rc1-dev.jar dated Jan 28, though I'm not 
sure if that's when I built it.

> Then it's "buggy" 
> anyway, so it probably doesn't make sense to test it. But even with the 
> current SVN version I don't see how it makes sense to use 
> MultiFieldQueryParser for searches on just one field.

Sure, if n/a it can be ignored, and I'll strike it from the output after 
there's more discussion here if we want the page made cleaner..

> Regards
>  Daniel

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message