lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chris (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-671) Hashtable based Document
Date Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:23:23 GMT
     [ ]

Chris updated LUCENE-671:


> Hashtable based Document
> ------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-671
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Index, Search
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.9
>            Reporter: Chris
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments:,
> I've attached a Document based on a hashtable and a performance test case. It performs
better in most cases (all but enumeration by my measurement), but likely uses a larger memory
footprint. The Document testcase will fail since it accesses the "fields" variable directly
and gets confused when it's not the list it expected it to be. 
> If nothing else we would be interested in at least being able to extend Document, which
is currently declared final. (Anyone know the performance gains on declaring a class final?)
Currently we have to maintain a copy of lucene which has methods and classes definalized and
> There are other classes as well that could be declared non-final (Fieldable comes to
mind) since it's possible to make changes for project specific situations in those aswell
but that's off-topic.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
For more information on JIRA, see:


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message