lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chris (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-671) Hashtable based Document
Date Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:56:24 GMT
    [ ] 
Chris commented on LUCENE-671:

After some digging:

If these classes are declared final for performance, it might be worth reconsidering. I know
of at least one other development group that has to maintain their own lucene tree for the
same reason. (Both of us have had to make changes in FieldsWriter to store extra information
about the field)

re: (Fieldable comes to mind)
Yup I meant field, and I'll look into Abstract Field, thanks Mike. 

> Hashtable based Document
> ------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-671
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Index, Search
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.9
>            Reporter: Chris
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments:,
> I've attached a Document based on a hashtable and a performance test case. It performs
better in most cases (all but enumeration by my measurement), but likely uses a larger memory
footprint. The Document testcase will fail since it accesses the "fields" variable directly
and gets confused when it's not the list it expected it to be. 
> If nothing else we would be interested in at least being able to extend Document, which
is currently declared final. (Anyone know the performance gains on declaring a class final?)
Currently we have to maintain a copy of lucene which has methods and classes definalized and
> There are other classes as well that could be declared non-final (Fieldable comes to
mind) since it's possible to make changes for project specific situations in those aswell
but that's off-topic.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
For more information on JIRA, see:


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message