lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Steven Parkes" <>
Subject RE: Lucene 2.1, soon
Date Mon, 05 Feb 2007 23:59:03 GMT
I've been looking at 762. It does look a bit hairy, dealing with all the
protection levels of the classes. Did you come up with an approach you
were happy with? 

-----Original Message-----
From: Grant Ingersoll [] 
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 3:57 AM
Subject: Re: Lucene 2.1, soon


I would like a few more days  to get 
browse/LUCENE-762, as it may involve moving some classes and I don't  
want to do that after an official release.  It is not a major issue,  
but I do think it is important to get right before the release.

Sorry for the delay.

On Feb 1, 2007, at 6:02 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:

> Michael Busch wrote:
>> Michael McCandless wrote:
>>> I plan on committing this one today.  Once that's in I think we can
>>> and should get the release process going (Yonik had graciously
>>> volunteered to be the release manager)?
>> +1 for starting the release process. Especially the big new  
>> features "lazy field loading", "lockless commits" and "delete in  
>> IndexWriter" should make it a valuable upgrade for a lot of users.  
>> Additionally, there have been various patches that improve  
>> performance or prevent index corruption.
> OK I just committed LUCENE-565 so I think we can get 2.1 started now?
> Mike
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

Grant Ingersoll
Center for Natural Language Processing

Read the Lucene Java FAQ at 

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message