lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Grant Ingersoll <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] release Lucene 2.1
Date Thu, 15 Feb 2007 11:50:56 GMT

On Feb 15, 2007, at 2:55 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote:

> : > I'm not exactly sure if this is show stopper, but when I get the
> : > binary, the build.xml that is included is not usable b/c it is
> : > missing common-build.xml.
> : Oops... I think we should fix this for the release if at all
> : possible.  It is handy for folks to be able to pull down a buildable
> : archive and rest assured that they are getting something built at  
> the
> : same time the binary was made.
> I'm confused ... the binary builds don't even include src/java/ so  
> it's
> not a buildable archive by any strech of hte imagination -- how would
> having the common-build.xml help assure people of anything?
> i'm not even sure why we inlcude the build.xml in the binary releases.

Yeah, I'm not sure we need the build included for binary releases  
either, I just think it should work if it is included.

What's weird, is I don't think much has changed build wise from the  
last release, yet we all of a sudden noticed all these things.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message