lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Doron Cohen" <cdor...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: SinkTokenizer: next(Token) vs. next()
Date Fri, 28 Dec 2007 14:27:56 GMT
On Dec 28, 2007 4:10 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org> wrote:

> I'm fine w/ making this change.  No sense in implementing both as we
> can just rely on next(Token) to call next().  I will commit the change
> and put a comment on the issue that created the SinkTokenizer.
>

Cool thanks!

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message