lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrzej Bialecki>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Relax backwards-compatibility policy for package-protected APIs
Date Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:50:11 GMT
Michael McCandless wrote:
> I think *not* having to maintain back compat of the package private APIs 
> is very important to keeping our freedom (and sanity!) to continue to 
> improve Lucene.  This is similar to marking a new API as experimental 
> and subject to suddenly change in the next release: it reserves our 
> future freedom.

Definitely +1 on this strategy, so long as it's clearly documented.

Example: I'm working on a new version of Luke, where I use some of the 
internal and experimental APIs (e.g. the commit points), being aware 
that things may break in nasty ways if I upgrade to a different version 
of Lucene. I've been forewarned, and I won't complain. :)

Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki     <><
  ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _   __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/|  Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__||  \|  ||  |  Embedded Unix, System Integration  Contact: info at sigram dot com

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message