lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mark Miller (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1708) Improve the use of isDeleted in the indexing code
Date Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:13:47 GMT


Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1708:

I suppose, to be fair, we do mention that we might change runtime behaviour and document it
- its just that we don't usually say, code around it.

I guess its simple enough here thats its not really a big deal. I was just surprised I saw
no mention of back compat in the discussion other than Mike mentioning that the change should
be made through deprecation early on in the attached email thread.

> Improve the use of isDeleted in the indexing code
> -------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-1708
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Index
>            Reporter: Shai Erera
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>             Fix For: 2.9
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1708.patch, LUCENE-1708.patch
> A spin off from here:
> Two changes:
> # Optimize SegmentMerger work when a reader has no deletions.
> # IndexReader.document() will no longer check if the document is deleted.
> Will post a patch shortly

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message