lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: contrib and lucene 3.0
Date Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:16:06 GMT
I have no problem with new features either - but I would vote that if it
requires new deprecations, it should wait.

I think its nice to have a clean release first. And I also don't think
any of this features should hold up the 3.0 release. Lets get it out -
then focus on new features.

Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> How do you handle deprecations of old stuff for the new contribution
> (assuming it needs it)?  Seems weird to have a major release that
> immediately has deprecations.  At the same time, it seems weird to
> have a major release that doesn't contain new features.  If anything,
> it is our best opportunity to put in new stuff
>
> Traditionally, the only difference between .9 and .0 has been removal
> of deprecations.  This time around we are saying also JDK 1.5.
>
> Not saying we can't do it, just wondering.
>
> On Oct 30, 2009, at 3:31 PM, DM Smith wrote:
>
>> I don't see any reason to freeze new contributions from any release.
>>
>> On 10/30/2009 03:19 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
>>> thanks Michael.
>>>
>>> does anyone else have any opinion on this issue?
>>> fyi we already have several new features committed to 3.0 contrib
>>> already (see contrib/CHANGES),
>>> but I don't too much care either way, if I should not be adding this
>>> feature to 3.0, I'd like to set the version in jira to 3.1
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Michael McCandless
>>> <lucene@mikemccandless.com <mailto:lucene@mikemccandless.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     I think we should allow new features into contrib for 3.0.
>>>
>>>     I don't even like holding new features from core for 3.0.
>>>
>>>     In general I don't think it's healthy when trunk is locked down....
>>>     Trunk should be like a locomotive that's plowing ahead at all times.
>>>
>>>     Mike
>>>
>>>     On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Robert Muir <rcmuir@gmail.com
>>>     <mailto:rcmuir@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>     > Hi,
>>>     >
>>>     > What is the consensus on new features for contrib for Lucene
>>>     3.0? I know
>>>     > that for core, its mostly a java 5 upgrade and deprecation
>>>     removal.
>>>     >
>>>     > I want to make sure LUCENE-1606 is set to the right version,
>>>     but I figured
>>>     > its really not just about that specific issue, I would like to
>>>     know the
>>>     > plans in general.
>>>     >
>>>     > Thanks,
>>>     > Robert
>>>     >
>>>     > --
>>>     > Robert Muir
>>>     > rcmuir@gmail.com <mailto:rcmuir@gmail.com>
>>>     >
>>>
>>>     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>     To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>     <mailto:java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
>>>     For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>     <mailto:java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Robert Muir
>>> rcmuir@gmail.com <mailto:rcmuir@gmail.com>
>>
>
>


-- 
- Mark

http://www.lucidimagination.com




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message