lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: contrib and lucene 3.0
Date Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:40:22 GMT
What deprecations were already added?

Robert Muir wrote:
> well, not to complain, but I will mention on this topic.
>
> If something is marked deprecated, its 10x easier if in the javadocs
> there is some version information applied.
>
> In the wild west that is contrib, its currently a bit difficult for me
> to clear out the deprecations from 2.9, because there are new
> deprecations added in 3.0.
> it takes svn annotate + jira + CHANGES to figure out exactly what
> should be cleared out (and sometimes these all seem to disagree, Fix
> Version != Changes, etc etc)
>
> This is why i only did part of LUCENE-2022
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Mark Miller <markrmiller@gmail.com
> <mailto:markrmiller@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     I have no problem with new features either - but I would vote that
>     if it
>     requires new deprecations, it should wait.
>
>     I think its nice to have a clean release first. And I also don't think
>     any of this features should hold up the 3.0 release. Lets get it out -
>     then focus on new features.
>
>     Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>     > How do you handle deprecations of old stuff for the new contribution
>     > (assuming it needs it)?  Seems weird to have a major release that
>     > immediately has deprecations.  At the same time, it seems weird to
>     > have a major release that doesn't contain new features.  If
>     anything,
>     > it is our best opportunity to put in new stuff
>     >
>     > Traditionally, the only difference between .9 and .0 has been
>     removal
>     > of deprecations.  This time around we are saying also JDK 1.5.
>     >
>     > Not saying we can't do it, just wondering.
>     >
>     > On Oct 30, 2009, at 3:31 PM, DM Smith wrote:
>     >
>     >> I don't see any reason to freeze new contributions from any
>     release.
>     >>
>     >> On 10/30/2009 03:19 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
>     >>> thanks Michael.
>     >>>
>     >>> does anyone else have any opinion on this issue?
>     >>> fyi we already have several new features committed to 3.0 contrib
>     >>> already (see contrib/CHANGES),
>     >>> but I don't too much care either way, if I should not be
>     adding this
>     >>> feature to 3.0, I'd like to set the version in jira to 3.1
>     >>>
>     >>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Michael McCandless
>     >>> <lucene@mikemccandless.com <mailto:lucene@mikemccandless.com>
>     <mailto:lucene@mikemccandless.com
>     <mailto:lucene@mikemccandless.com>>> wrote:
>     >>>
>     >>>     I think we should allow new features into contrib for 3.0.
>     >>>
>     >>>     I don't even like holding new features from core for 3.0.
>     >>>
>     >>>     In general I don't think it's healthy when trunk is locked
>     down....
>     >>>     Trunk should be like a locomotive that's plowing ahead at
>     all times.
>     >>>
>     >>>     Mike
>     >>>
>     >>>     On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Robert Muir
>     <rcmuir@gmail.com <mailto:rcmuir@gmail.com>
>     >>>     <mailto:rcmuir@gmail.com <mailto:rcmuir@gmail.com>>>
wrote:
>     >>>     > Hi,
>     >>>     >
>     >>>     > What is the consensus on new features for contrib for Lucene
>     >>>     3.0? I know
>     >>>     > that for core, its mostly a java 5 upgrade and deprecation
>     >>>     removal.
>     >>>     >
>     >>>     > I want to make sure LUCENE-1606 is set to the right version,
>     >>>     but I figured
>     >>>     > its really not just about that specific issue, I would
>     like to
>     >>>     know the
>     >>>     > plans in general.
>     >>>     >
>     >>>     > Thanks,
>     >>>     > Robert
>     >>>     >
>     >>>     > --
>     >>>     > Robert Muir
>     >>>     > rcmuir@gmail.com <mailto:rcmuir@gmail.com>
>     <mailto:rcmuir@gmail.com <mailto:rcmuir@gmail.com>>
>     >>>     >
>     >>>
>     >>>    
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >>>     To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>     java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>     <mailto:java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
>     >>>     <mailto:java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>     <mailto:java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>>
>     >>>     For additional commands, e-mail:
>     java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>     <mailto:java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
>     >>>     <mailto:java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>     <mailto:java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org>>
>     >>>
>     >>>
>     >>>
>     >>>
>     >>> --
>     >>> Robert Muir
>     >>> rcmuir@gmail.com <mailto:rcmuir@gmail.com>
>     <mailto:rcmuir@gmail.com <mailto:rcmuir@gmail.com>>
>     >>
>     >
>     >
>
>
>     --
>     - Mark
>
>     http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
>
>
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>     To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>     <mailto:java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
>     For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>     <mailto:java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Robert Muir
> rcmuir@gmail.com <mailto:rcmuir@gmail.com>


-- 
- Mark

http://www.lucidimagination.com




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message