lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <>
Subject Re: [SOLR] use of solr.* in e.g., response writers, but other places
Date Sun, 30 May 2010 04:26:01 GMT
> (same reason svn uses the "svn:" in the properties that SVN expects to
> "own")

So, it's almost like a protocol or namespace more so than a class package. I
guess it's just the use of the "." which is kind of confusing to me then.
The "." indicates to me that it's a class I guess from an eyeballing it
perspective, but in fact, you're using it more like a protocol or namespace
URN, which would kind of dictate ":" as your "svn:" example shows.

I think something like "solr:<class name>", where <class name> can be:

* FQDN class name
* class name w/o FQDN with FQDN package in {default set} prefixed

Wouldn't that make more sense?


Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message