lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ryan McKinley (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs
Date Fri, 17 Sep 2010 18:51:32 GMT


Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-2649:

bq. If ya care - don't pass a null parser! Otherwise you get the default. 

What if I care, but somethign else (that does not care) asks for the value first?  Seems odd
to have so much depend on *who* asks for the value first

bq. A better option is to replace FieldCache.Parser in SortField to be FieldCache.EntryCreator.

How would that work?  What if a filter creates the cache before the SortField?  

> FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs
> ----------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-2649
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Ryan McKinley
>             Fix For: 4.0
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2649-FieldCacheWithBitSet.patch, LUCENE-2649-FieldCacheWithBitSet.patch,
> The FieldCache returns an array representing the values for each doc.  However there
is no way to know if the doc actually has a value.
> This should be changed to return an object representing the values *and* a BitSet for
all valid docs.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message