lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Robert Muir (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2662) BytesHash
Date Fri, 24 Sep 2010 12:49:33 GMT


Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2662:

bq. I guess that is the first step towards factoring it out of TermsHashPerField, the next
question is are we gonna do that in a different issue and get this committed first?

I think it would be better if this class were used in the patch... i wouldn't commit it by
itself unused. Its difficult for people to review its behavior, since its just a standalone
unused thing (for instance, the hashCode thing i brought up)

> BytesHash
> ---------
>                 Key: LUCENE-2662
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Index
>    Affects Versions: Realtime Branch, 4.0
>            Reporter: Jason Rutherglen
>            Assignee: Simon Willnauer
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: Realtime Branch, 4.0
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2662.patch, LUCENE-2662.patch
> This issue will have the BytesHash separated out from LUCENE-2186

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message