lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Nick Pellow (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2235) implement PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper.getOffsetGap
Date Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:36:13 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12967148#action_12967148
] 

Nick Pellow commented on LUCENE-2235:
-------------------------------------

Thanks for the clarification, Uwe. I wasn't sure if null Analyzers were meant to be accepted
or not. I was upgrading some existing code from 3.0.2 to 3.0.3 and stumbled across that, so
its good to know.

I've created LUCENE-2801 to track the real reason the check should be done too!

> implement PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper.getOffsetGap
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2235
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2235
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Analysis
>    Affects Versions: 3.0
>         Environment: Any
>            Reporter: Javier Godoy
>            Assignee: Uwe Schindler
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.9.4, 3.0.3, 3.1, 4.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2235.patch, PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper.patch
>
>
> PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper does not delegates calls to getOffsetGap(Fieldable), instead
it returns the default values from the implementation of Analyzer. (Similar to LUCENE-659
"PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper fails to implement getPositionIncrementGap")

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message