lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael McCandless <>
Subject Re: Changes Mess
Date Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:54:29 GMT
So, going forward...

When committing an issue that needs a changes entry, where are we
supposed to put it?

EG if it's a bug fix that we'll backport all the way to 2.9.x... where
does it go?

If it's a new feature/API that's going to 3.x and trunk... only in
3.x's CHANGES?


On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Uwe Schindler <> wrote:
> Hi all,
> when merging changes done in 2.9.4/3.0.3 with current 3.x and trunk I found
> out that 3.x changes differ immense between the trunk changes.txt and the
> 3.x changes.txt. Some entries are missing in the 3.x branch, but are
> available in trunk's 3.x part or other entries using new trunk class names
> are between 3.x changes in trunk.
> I copied over the 3.x branch CHANGES.txt over trunks 3.x section and
> attached a patch of this. What should we do? Its messy :( Most parts seem to
> be merge failures. We should go through all those diff'ed issues and check
> where they were really fixed (3.x or trunk) and move the entries
> accordingly. After that in the 3.x branch and in trunk's 3.x section of
> CHANGES.txt should be identical text!
> Uwe
> -----
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> eMail:
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message