lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2883) Consolidate Solr & Lucene FunctionQuery into modules
Date Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:28:44 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12987604#action_12987604
] 

Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2883:
-----------------------------------------

bq. Does that make sense?

I think it does.  I think, as usual, it can be handled case by case.  Just as Robert pointed
out, some analysis things stayed in Solr, I don't think anyone is going to argue that we should
put things where they most make sense.  In general, though, I think the modules affords us
a lot of opportunity through more exposure at the loss of a little bit of flexibility in Solr,
which, as you said can still be handled by doing that little piece in just Solr.


> Consolidate Solr  & Lucene FunctionQuery into modules
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2883
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2883
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Search
>    Affects Versions: 4.0
>            Reporter: Simon Willnauer
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>
> Spin-off from the [dev list | http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@lucene.apache.org/msg13261.html]
 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message