lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Robert Muir (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2883) Consolidate Solr & Lucene FunctionQuery into modules
Date Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:40:43 GMT


Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2883:

bq. but with the distinction that changes in modules need to account for Solr as well as Lucene.

I thought this was understood about modules anyway, that we move the code there, all committers
have access and its shared code to support both projects.

hopefully we didnt screw this up in anyway for modules/analysis, I don't think Solr lost anything

Separately, for the record, we didnt merge ALL of Solr's analysis stuff into modules/analysis.
Some of this stuff really is solr-specific (e.g. ReverseWildCard support that needs some schema
+ qp integration).
This really solr-specific stuff that isn't generally useful stayed in Solr.

So I think we should always consider this for future modules, it doesn't have to be a binary
but instead what is general and makes sense.

> Consolidate Solr  & Lucene FunctionQuery into modules
> -----------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-2883
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Search
>    Affects Versions: 4.0
>            Reporter: Simon Willnauer
>             Fix For: 4.0
> Spin-off from the [dev list |]

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message