lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Yonik Seeley (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2883) Consolidate Solr & Lucene FunctionQuery into modules
Date Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:08:44 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12987595#action_12987595
] 

Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2883:
--------------------------------------

bq. hopefully we didnt screw this up in anyway for modules/analysis, I don't think Solr lost
anything here.

Right, modules/analysis never concerned me since the filters moved there were nice and self
contained, they only already relied on the lucene analysis interfaces, would easy to make
a solr-specific copy of one if really needed in the future, and left some of the solr specific
stuff where it was.  It all made sense and was a win-win.

We've hung a lot of features on function queries in Solr, and I've had plans for more to come
- which is why it's not acceptable for it to suddenly not be a core part of Solr.

bq. its shared code to support both projects.

The "status" and expectations for the code are one of the big issues here - it's not just
about the technical issues of what a patch looks like.  I would expect, for example, to be
able to add a feature that probably only made sense for solr (as long as it didn't prevent
lucene users from using function queries in general of course).  Is that acceptable to everyone?
 I would not necessarily have the same expectation for other things in modules - it really
depends on what it is.  Does that make sense?



> Consolidate Solr  & Lucene FunctionQuery into modules
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2883
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2883
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Search
>    Affects Versions: 4.0
>            Reporter: Simon Willnauer
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>
> Spin-off from the [dev list | http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@lucene.apache.org/msg13261.html]
 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message