lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Peter Sturge (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (SOLR-1709) Distributed Date Faceting
Date Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:51:45 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12987533#action_12987533
] 

Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-1709:
------------------------------------

Hi David,

I thought this was for the 3x branch, but I still get confused since the all the names changed.
Are you finding this patch not working on 3x? (remember also to apply SOLR-1729)

I've not tried this on trunk, as there has been a lot of flux in this area in the recent past.
As I've not tried it, I'm not sure how this patch works on trunk - possibly requiring a manual
merge.

Peter


> Distributed Date Faceting
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-1709
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1709
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SearchComponents - other
>    Affects Versions: 1.4
>            Reporter: Peter Sturge
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: FacetComponent.java, FacetComponent.java, ResponseBuilder.java,
solr-1.4.0-solr-1709.patch
>
>
> This patch is for adding support for date facets when using distributed searches.
> Date faceting across multiple machines exposes some time-based issues that anyone interested
in this behaviour should be aware of:
> Any time and/or time-zone differences are not accounted for in the patch (i.e. merged
date facets are at a time-of-day, not necessarily at a universal 'instant-in-time', unless
all shards are time-synced to the exact same time).
> The implementation uses the first encountered shard's facet_dates as the basis for subsequent
shards' data to be merged in.
> This means that if subsequent shards' facet_dates are skewed in relation to the first
by >1 'gap', these 'earlier' or 'later' facets will not be merged in.
> There are several reasons for this:
>   * Performance: It's faster to check facet_date lists against a single map's data, rather
than against each other, particularly if there are many shards
>   * If 'earlier' and/or 'later' facet_dates are added in, this will make the time range
larger than that which was requested
>         (e.g. a request for one hour's worth of facets could bring back 2, 3 or more
hours of data)
>     This could be dealt with if timezone and skew information was added, and the dates
were normalized.
> One possibility for adding such support is to [optionally] add 'timezone' and 'now' parameters
to the 'facet_dates' map. This would tell requesters what time and TZ the remote server thinks
it is, and so multiple shards' time data can be normalized.
> The patch affects 2 files in the Solr core:
>   org.apache.solr.handler.component.FacetComponent.java
>   org.apache.solr.handler.component.ResponseBuilder.java
> The main changes are in FacetComponent - ResponseBuilder is just to hold the completed
SimpleOrderedMap until the finishStage.
> One possible enhancement is to perhaps make this an optional parameter, but really, if
facet.date parameters are specified, it is assumed they are desired.
> Comments & suggestions welcome.
> As a favour to ask, if anyone could take my 2 source files and create a PATCH file from
it, it would be greatly appreciated, as I'm having a bit of trouble with svn (don't shoot
me, but my environment is a Redmond-based os company).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message