lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Yonik Seeley <>
Subject Re: FYI: Javadoc update needed re: omitTf
Date Mon, 03 Jan 2011 19:26:42 GMT
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Simon Willnauer
<> wrote:
> While we are on it, would it make sense to move omitTfAP into the
> Index enum. It always felt odd that you can omit norms using the enum
> but use a setter to omit TF & Pos.

I think the attempted move to type safety / enums is what added the
most complexity to Field, and I think it's a mistake to go further
down the path of combinatorial explosion.  I don't care if new enum
values are made, just please don't remove the setters.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message