lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Uwe Schindler" <...@thetaphi.de>
Subject RE: [VOTE] Lucene and Solr 3.1 release candidate
Date Tue, 08 Mar 2011 14:05:22 GMT
I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2954

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 2:43 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Lucene and Solr 3.1 release candidate
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I found a serious issue in CheckIndex.java (lines 357++):
> If you run CheckIndex on an index updated or changed with 3.1 it print the
> following:
> 
> 2011-03-08 14:38:56,373 INFO org.apache.lucene.index.CheckIndex -
> Segments file=segments_g19 numSegments=5 version=-11 [Lucene 1.3 or
> prior]
> 
> Too stupid. We should check all other version numbers printed in CheckIndex
> and fix accordingly. I know, Shaie added new versions in several other files,
> too. I don't think we can provide this to users, as it will cause lot's of JIRA
> issues complaining about that.
> 
> Do we also need to fix the Solr' ConcurentLRUMap issue? Yonik? I provided a
> patch this morning.
> 
> Uwe
> 
> -----
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcmuir@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 7:33 AM
> > To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: [VOTE] Lucene and Solr 3.1 release candidate
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have posted a release candidate for both Lucene 3.1 and Solr 3.1,
> > both from revision 1078688 of
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_3_1/
> > Thanks for all your help! Please test them and give your votes, the
> > tentative release date for both versions is Sunday, March 13th, 2011.
> > Only votes from Lucene PMC are binding, but everyone is welcome to
> > check the release candidates and voice their approval or disapproval.
> > The vote passes if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
> >
> > The release candidates are produced in parallel because in 2010 we
> > merged the development of Lucene and Solr in order to produce higher
> > quality releases. While we voted to reserve the right to release
> > Lucene by itself, in my opinion we should definitely try to avoid this
> > unless absolutely necessary, as it would ultimately cause more work
> > and complication: instead it would be far easier to just fix whatever
> > issues are discovered and respin both releases again.
> >
> > Because of this, I ask that you cast a single vote to cover both
> > releases. If the vote succeeds, both sets of artifacts can go their
> > separate ways to the different websites.
> >
> > Artifacts are located here: http://s.apache.org/solrcene31rc0
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For
> > additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional
> commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message