lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andi Vajda (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-2981) Review and potentially remove unused/unsupported Contribs
Date Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:06:05 GMT


Andi Vajda commented on LUCENE-2981:

Unless there are users, I'm +1 for removing db anytime.
Last time I fixed something there was for the Java version of db, a contribution by someone
else I haven't heard of in years.
I haven't heard from any users with questions or bug reports in a long time either.

> Review and potentially remove unused/unsupported Contribs
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-2981
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
>             Fix For: 3.2, 4.0
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2981.patch
> Some of our contribs appear to be lacking for development/support or are missing tests.
 We should review whether they are even pertinent these days and potentially deprecate and
remove them.
> One of the things we did in Mahout when bringing in Colt code was to mark all code that
didn't have tests as @deprecated and then we removed the deprecation once tests were added.
 Those that didn't get tests added over about a 6 mos. period of time were removed.
> I would suggest taking a hard look at:
> ant
> db
> lucli
> swing
> (spatial should be gutted to some extent and moved to modules)

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message