lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jan Høydahl <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Lucene 3.1.0 RC3
Date Mon, 28 Mar 2011 20:38:32 GMT
My comments, mostly minor:
* README.TXT - Mixes Unix- and Windows-style syntaxes without further comments
  Propose to change e.g. %JAVA_HOME%\bin -> $JAVA_HOME/bin to be consistent and add a comment
about Windows
* CHANGES.TXT - The headline "Upgrading from Solr 1.4" should be "Upgrading from Solr 1.4.1"?
* docs/who.html is old - refers to the old Solr committers list at
* docs/features.html - Does not list CSV among response writers
* CHANGES.TXT - No mention of SOLR-1889 (dismax respecting q.op) - I thought this was backported
in 3.1?

* After building, http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/registry.jsp shows "Solr Implementation
Version: 3.1-SNAPSHOT"
  Is that correct, or should it be 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT or something else?

Last comment: I know we've intentionally bundled slf4j-jdk14-1.5.5.jar in the war to help
newbies get up and running. But I find myself re-packaging the war for every customer when
adapting to their choice of logger framework, which is counter-productive. Would it not be
sufficient to have the jdk-logging binding in example/lib to let the example and tutorial
still work OOTB but as soon as you deploy solr.war to production you're forced to explicitly
decide what logging to use.

Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS -

On 27. mars 2011, at 04.07, Grant Ingersoll wrote:

> Artifacts are at  Please vote as
you see appropriate.  Vote closes on March 29th.
> I've also updated the Release To Do for both Lucene and Solr and it is hopefully a lot
easier now to produce the artifacts as more of it is automated (including uploading to staging
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message