lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mark Miller (Commented) (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2685) always use SolrInputDocument
Date Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:10:39 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13179111#comment-13179111
] 

Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2685:
-----------------------------------

went to do this in the solrcloud branch the other day but it's already been done
                
> always use SolrInputDocument
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-2685
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2685
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Yonik Seeley
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-2685.patch
>
>
> First, there was only Document, then AddUpdateCommand added support for SolrInputDocument,
and most document producers create SolrInputDocuments.  But AddUpdateCommand continues to
support both, leading to confusion and more work for update processors (which should they
look at? both?).  It seems like we should remove "Document" from AddUpdateCommand for the
sake of consistency.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message