lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Smiley (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4599) Compressed term vectors
Date Sat, 08 Dec 2012 05:49:20 GMT


David Smiley commented on LUCENE-4599:

Does it make sense to put this in an FST where the key is the term bytes and the value is
what you're doing now for the positions, offsets, and payloads in a byte array?  The point
to this is that a term dictionary is going to use much less space with sharing of prefixes
and suffixes of words.

Or... can we simply reference the terms by ord (an int) instead of writing each term bytes?
> Compressed term vectors
> -----------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-4599
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: core/codecs, core/termvectors
>            Reporter: Adrien Grand
>            Assignee: Adrien Grand
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 4.1
>         Attachments: LUCENE-4599.patch
> We should have codec-compressed term vectors similarly to what we have with stored fields.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message