lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Koji Sekiguchi (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3359) SynonymFilterFactory should accept analyzer attribute
Date Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:30:49 GMT


Koji Sekiguchi commented on SOLR-3359:

bq. Is there any particular reason why this enhancement is not targeted at 4.x as well?

Well, my motivation was that CJKTokenizer(Factory) marked as deprecated and it would be gone
at 5.0. If someone provide a patch for 4.x, I'm happy to commit it.

bq. Also, could the title summary be updated to reflect the fact that the change specifies
the analyzer class name rather than "fieldType"?

> SynonymFilterFactory should accept analyzer attribute
> -----------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: SOLR-3359
>                 URL:
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Schema and Analysis
>            Reporter: Koji Sekiguchi
>            Assignee: Koji Sekiguchi
>             Fix For: 5.0
>         Attachments: 0001-Make-SynonymFilterFactory-accept-analyzer-attr.patch
> I've not been realized that CJKTokenizer and its factory classes was marked deprecated
in 3.6/4.0 (the ticket is LUCENE-2906) until someone talked to me.
> {code}
>  * @deprecated Use StandardTokenizer, CJKWidthFilter, CJKBigramFilter, and LowerCaseFilter
> {code}
> I agree with the idea of using the chain of the Tokenizer and TokenFilters instead of
CJKTokenizer, but it could be a problem for the existing users of SynonymFilterFactory with
> So this ticket comes to my mind again.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message