lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kenji Kikuchi (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (SOLR-6557) bandwidth cap for large file replication
Date Fri, 26 Sep 2014 07:50:34 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Kenji Kikuchi updated SOLR-6557:
--------------------------------
    Attachment: SOLR-6557.patch

The attached SOLR-6557.patch works with SOLR-6485.
It allows each slave server to request desired replication bandwidth. This will help our operations.
Please review the SOLR-6557.patch.


> bandwidth cap for large file replication
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-6557
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6557
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: replication (java)
>    Affects Versions: 5.0, Trunk
>            Reporter: Kenji Kikuchi
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 5.0, Trunk
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-6557.patch, SOLR-replication_bandwidth.patch
>
>
> Sometimes I need to set up a slave server in the rack where a master
> server does not exist. In this case, our rack to rack bandwidth is often
> saturated during large file transfer, such as initial replication, large
> index file merge and optimization. This impairs our other services. So I
> think a bandwidth cap for large file replication is helpful for large web service providers
and adds flexibility to our Solr slave server setups.
> Currently I am limiting replication bandwidth by using a tc command on
> the master servers. But to use a tc command, I need to login to an
> on-service master server and add tc related settings to add a new slave
> server because tc command only shapes outbound traffics. So the feature
> of setting up a desired replication bandwidth cap with just one line in
> a new slave configuration file reduces our Solr operations and secures
> the on-service master servers by avoiding the need to login.
> Parsing bandwidth setting in slave solrconfig.xml in ‘bits per
> second' is preferable for me. This is because most of our site operators
> use ‘bits per second' not ‘bytes per second’ in our network monitoring
> metrics.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message