lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Shalin Shekhar Mangar (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2927) SolrIndexSearcher's register do not match close and SolrCore's closeSearcher
Date Tue, 04 Nov 2014 15:24:34 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14196222#comment-14196222
] 

Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-2927:
---------------------------------------------

bq. I tested the fix I provided against solr-4.2 branch, maybe that's why I did not have the
2 extra leaking mbeans.

Yes, both of those qparsers are newer than 4.2.

This is fixed in trunk and branch_5x. Thanks Tom, Sharath, Michael and Cyrille!

> SolrIndexSearcher's register do not match close and SolrCore's closeSearcher
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-2927
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2927
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: search
>    Affects Versions: 4.0-ALPHA
>         Environment: JDK1.6/CentOS
>            Reporter: tom liu
>            Assignee: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
>             Fix For: 5.0, Trunk
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-2927.patch, SOLR-2927.patch, mbean-leak-jira.png
>
>
> # SolrIndexSearcher's register method put the name of searcher, but SolrCore's closeSearcher
method remove name of currentSearcher on infoRegistry.
> # SolrIndexSearcher's register method put the name of cache, but SolrIndexSearcher's
close do not remove the name of cache.
> so, there maybe lost some memory leak.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message