lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Noble Paul (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6517) CollectionsAPI call REBALANCELEADERS
Date Sun, 02 Nov 2014 08:07:34 GMT


Noble Paul commented on SOLR-6517:

bq.So REBALANCELEADERS will cause any shard where the current leader is not the preferredLeader
to re-elect leadership.

As I see in the code code it just sends a message to overseer to change the leader of the

> ------------------------------------
>                 Key: SOLR-6517
>                 URL:
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>    Affects Versions: 5.0, Trunk
>            Reporter: Erick Erickson
>            Assignee: Erick Erickson
>             Fix For: 5.0, Trunk
>         Attachments: SOLR-6517.patch, SOLR-6517.patch, SOLR-6517.patch
> Perhaps the final piece of SOLR-6491. Once the preferred leadership roles are assigned,
there has to be a command "make it so Mr. Solr". This is something of a placeholder to collect
ideas. One wouldn't want to flood the system with hundreds of re-assignments at once. Should
this be synchronous or asnych? Should it make the best attempt but not worry about perfection?
Should it???
> a collection=name parameter would be required and it would re-elect all the leaders that
were on the 'wrong' node
> I'm thinking an optionally allowing one to specify a shard in the case where you wanted
to make a very specific change. Note that there's no need to specify a particular replica,
since there should be only a single preferredLeader per slice.
> This command would do nothing to any slice that did not have a replica with a preferredLeader
role. Likewise it would do nothing if the slice in question already had the leader role assigned
to the node with the preferredLeader role.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message