lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Robert Muir (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6287) Corrupt index (missing .si file) on first 4.x commit to a 3.x index
Date Tue, 24 Feb 2015 20:07:05 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14335348#comment-14335348
] 

Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-6287:
-------------------------------------

looks good. Thanks for tracking this down!

> Corrupt index (missing .si file) on first 4.x commit to a 3.x index
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-6287
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6287
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 4.10.4
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-6287.patch, LUCENE-6287.patch
>
>
> If you have a 3.x index, and you open it with a 4.x IndexWriter for
> the first time, and you do something that kicks of merges while
> concurrently committing, it's possible the index will corrupt itself
> with exceptions like this:
> {noformat}
> java.nio.file.NoSuchFileException: /l/tmp/reruns.TestBackwardsCompatibility3x.testMergeDuringUpgrade.t2/lucene.index.TestBackwardsCompatibility3x-71F31CCCEF6853A-001/manysegments.362-006/_0.si
> 	at sun.nio.fs.UnixException.translateToIOException(UnixException.java:86)
> 	at sun.nio.fs.UnixException.rethrowAsIOException(UnixException.java:102)
> 	at sun.nio.fs.UnixException.rethrowAsIOException(UnixException.java:107)
> 	at sun.nio.fs.UnixFileSystemProvider.newFileChannel(UnixFileSystemProvider.java:177)
> 	at java.nio.channels.FileChannel.open(FileChannel.java:287)
> 	at java.nio.channels.FileChannel.open(FileChannel.java:334)
> 	at org.apache.lucene.store.NIOFSDirectory.openInput(NIOFSDirectory.java:81)
> 	at org.apache.lucene.store.FilterDirectory.openInput(FilterDirectory.java:80)
> 	at org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene3x.Lucene3xSegmentInfoReader.read(Lucene3xSegmentInfoReader.java:106)
> 	at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos.read(SegmentInfos.java:358)
> 	at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos$1.doBody(SegmentInfos.java:454)
> 	at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos$FindSegmentsFile.run(SegmentInfos.java:906)
> 	at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos$FindSegmentsFile.run(SegmentInfos.java:752)
> 	at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos.read(SegmentInfos.java:457)
> 	at org.apache.lucene.index.CheckIndex.checkIndex(CheckIndex.java:414)
> 	at org.apache.lucene.util.TestUtil.checkIndex(TestUtil.java:207)
> 	at org.apache.lucene.util.TestUtil.checkIndex(TestUtil.java:196)
> 	at org.apache.lucene.store.BaseDirectoryWrapper.close(BaseDirectoryWrapper.java:45)
> 	at org.apache.lucene.index.TestBackwardsCompatibility3x.testMergeDuringUpgrade(TestBackwardsCompatibility3x.java:1035)
> {noformat}
> Back compat tests in Elasticsearch hit this, and at first I thought maybe LUCENE-6279
was the cause (I still think we should fix that) but after further debugging there is a different
concurrency bug lurking here.
> I have a test case which after substantial beasting is able to reproduce the bug, but
I don't yet have a fix.  I think IW is missing a checkpoint after writing a new commit...



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message