lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-445) Update Handlers abort with bad documents
Date Mon, 21 Mar 2016 00:43:34 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15203592#comment-15203592
] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-445:
------------------------------------------------------

Commit 8cc0a38453b389bdb031d78ad638b76dfa27f2d5 in lucene-solr's branch refs/heads/jira/SOLR-445
from [~hossman_lucene@fucit.org]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=8cc0a38 ]

SOLR-445: Merge branch 'master' into jira/SOLR-445


> Update Handlers abort with bad documents
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-445
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-445
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: update
>    Affects Versions: 1.3
>            Reporter: Will Johnson
>            Assignee: Hoss Man
>         Attachments: SOLR-445-3_x.patch, SOLR-445-alternative.patch, SOLR-445-alternative.patch,
SOLR-445-alternative.patch, SOLR-445-alternative.patch, SOLR-445.patch, SOLR-445.patch, SOLR-445.patch,
SOLR-445.patch, SOLR-445.patch, SOLR-445.patch, SOLR-445.patch, SOLR-445.patch, SOLR-445.patch,
SOLR-445_3x.patch, solr-445.xml
>
>
> Has anyone run into the problem of handling bad documents / failures mid batch.  Ie:
> <add>
>   <doc>
>     <field name="id">1</field>
>   </doc>
>   <doc>
>     <field name="id">2</field>
>     <field name="myDateField">I_AM_A_BAD_DATE</field>
>   </doc>
>   <doc>
>     <field name="id">3</field>
>   </doc>
> </add>
> Right now solr adds the first doc and then aborts.  It would seem like it should either
fail the entire batch or log a message/return a code and then continue on to add doc 3.  Option
1 would seem to be much harder to accomplish and possibly require more memory while Option
2 would require more information to come back from the API.  I'm about to dig into this but
I thought I'd ask to see if anyone had any suggestions, thoughts or comments.    



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message