lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Yonik Seeley (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8396) Investigate PointField to replace NumericField types
Date Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:59:25 GMT


Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-8396:

bq. As an aside, is there something we need to keep in mind due to LUCENE-7086 for implementing
these new numeric fields?

I don't think we need merged point fields anywhere... but that issue will cause exceptions
to be thrown even if we add a single unused point field to the index unfortunately.  We'll
still be able to work around it even if we can't get that issue fixed.

> Investigate PointField to replace NumericField types
> ----------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: SOLR-8396
>                 URL:
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
>         Attachments: SOLR-8396.patch, SOLR-8396.patch
> In LUCENE-6917, [~mikemccand] mentioned that DimensionalValues are better than NumericFields
in most respects. We should explore the benefits of using it in Solr and hence, if appropriate,
switch over to using them.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message