lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Robert Muir (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7122) BytesRefArray can be more efficient for fixed width values
Date Mon, 21 Mar 2016 12:52:25 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15204123#comment-15204123
] 

Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-7122:
-------------------------------------

Yes it must become package private. We are a search engine api not a byte pool utility api,
sorry. I don't care if you like it.

Seeing stuff like RecyclingByteBlockAllocator as public classes: thats horrible.

> BytesRefArray can be more efficient for fixed width values
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-7122
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7122
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>             Fix For: master, 6.1
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-7122.patch, LUCENE-7122.patch
>
>
> Today {{BytesRefArray}} uses one int ({{int[]}}, overallocated) per
> value to hold the length, but for dimensional points these values are
> always the same length. 
> This can save another 4 bytes of heap per indexed dimensional point,
> which is a big improvement (more points can fit in heap at once) for
> 1D and 2D lat/lon points.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message