lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Lucene/Solr 5.5.1
Date Wed, 27 Apr 2016 19:55:48 GMT
So the general idea is to add the version-to-be-released on every branch from which a version
will likely be cut in the future.  In this case that includes 5_5, 5x, 6_0, 6x, and master.
 
I think you should run addVersion.py on 6_0, since a 6.0.1 release seems quite likely, but
the script itself may need changes to make that work.

And I think you’re right: there are two stable branches: 5x and 6x.  There should be no
problem on 5x, but again, 6x may require script changes to make it work.

Sorry I can’t be more specific; you’re treading new ground here.

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com

> On Apr 27, 2016, at 3:18 PM, Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
> 
> I looked at it Steve but it's unclear in cases of release like this one i.e. 5x release
going out when 6.0 is already out.
> The stable branch as per definition is 6x (and I guess 5x?).
> 
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Steve Rowe <sarowe@gmail.com> wrote:
> Anshum,
> 
> Have you seen https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseTodo#Update_Version_Numbers_in_the_Source_Code
?
> 
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
> 
> > On Apr 27, 2016, at 2:33 PM, Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
> >
> > Can someone confirm the steps to update version numbers in source code for the 5.5.1
release? Here's my understanding:
> > * on branch_5_5: addVersion.py 5.5.1
> > * Using the commit id from previous step, run addVersion.py on branch_5x
> >
> > * Should we also be running this on master, 6x, and 6.0  branches?
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
> > Hi Steve,
> >
> > Yes, I missed the JIRA comment. Do you want to take it up?
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Steve Rowe <sarowe@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Anshum, is it okay to backport SOLR-8082 to 5.5.1? - Steve
> >
> > > On Apr 27, 2016, at 11:46 AM, Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks Yonik. I'll wait for this.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 9:42 PM, Yonik Seeley <yseeley@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:57 PM, Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net>
wrote:
> > > > Hey Tim, Sorry about going slow but there were a ton of back-ports.
> > > > I'm just waiting on Yonik or someone else who understands things better
to
> > > > back-port SOLR-8886
> > >
> > > Ha, I saw that scroll past. but didn't realize I was being pinged.
> > > I'll take a look at it tomorrow.
> > >
> > > -Yonik
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Anshum Gupta
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Anshum Gupta
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Anshum Gupta
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Anshum Gupta


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message