lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ishan Chattopadhyaya (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10011) Refactor PointField & TrieField to share common code
Date Sat, 21 Jan 2017 00:53:27 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Ishan Chattopadhyaya updated SOLR-10011:
----------------------------------------
    Description: 
We should eliminate PointTypes and TrieTypes enum to have a common enum for both. That would
enable us to share a lot of code between the two field types.

In the process, fix the bug:
PointFields with indexed=false, docValues=true seem to be using (Int|Double|Float|Long)Point.newRangeQuery()
for performing exact matches and range queries. However, they should instead be using DocValues
based range query.

  was:PointFields with indexed=false, docValues=true seem to be using (Int|Double|Float|Long)Point.newRangeQuery()
for performing exact matches and range queries. However, they should instead be using DocValuesRangeQuery.

     Issue Type: Improvement  (was: Bug)
        Summary: Refactor PointField & TrieField to share common code  (was: Non-indexed
PointFields with DVs should use DocValuesRangeQuery)

> Refactor PointField & TrieField to share common code
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-10011
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10011
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>            Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
>         Attachments: SOLR-10011.patch, SOLR-10011.patch
>
>
> We should eliminate PointTypes and TrieTypes enum to have a common enum for both. That
would enable us to share a lot of code between the two field types.
> In the process, fix the bug:
> PointFields with indexed=false, docValues=true seem to be using (Int|Double|Float|Long)Point.newRangeQuery()
for performing exact matches and range queries. However, they should instead be using DocValues
based range query.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message