lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ishan Chattopadhyaya <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 6.4.2 release?
Date Tue, 21 Feb 2017 18:05:32 GMT
I would like to volunteer for this 6.4.2 release. Planning to cut a RC as
soon as blockers are resolved.
One of the unresolved blocker issues seems to be LUCENE-7698 (I'll take a
look to see if there are more). If there are more issues that should be
part of the release, please let me know or mark as blockers in jira.

Thanks,
Ishan


On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 3:48 AM, Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com> wrote:

> I had initially planned on releasing tomorrow but the mirrors replicated
> faster than I had thought they would so I finished the release today,
> including the addition of the new 5.5.4 indices for backward testing so I
> am good with proceeding with a new release now.
>
> Le mer. 15 févr. 2017 à 16:13, Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> +1
>
> One ask I have is to wait for the 5.5.4 release process to be complete so
> that branch_6_4 has the 5.5.4 backward indices when we cut the first RC. I
> will let you know when I am done.
>
> Le mer. 15 févr. 2017 à 15:53, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) <
> cpoerschke@bloomberg.net> a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> These two could be minor candidates for inclusion:
>
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10083
> Fix instanceof check in ConstDoubleSource.equals
>
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7676
> FilterCodecReader to override more super-class methods
>
> The former had narrowly missed the 6.4.1 release.
>
> Regards,
>
> Christine
>
> From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 02/15/17 14:27:52
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re:6.4.2 release?
>
> Hi devs,
>
> These two issues seem serious enough to warrant a new release from
> branch_6_4:
> * SOLR-10130: Serious performance degradation in Solr 6.4.1 due to the new
> metrics collection
> * SOLR-10138: Transaction log replay can hit an NPE due to new Metrics
> code.
>
> What do you think? Anything else that should go there?
>
> ---
> Best regards,
>
> Andrzej Bialecki
>
>

Mime
View raw message