lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON)" <>
Subject Re: Feature freeze @ 7.0 branch
Date Wed, 05 Jul 2017 15:06:13 GMT
I'd like to see included in 7.0 since it's
a small low-risk change but it being in cache classes will benefit many users.


From: At: 07/05/17 16:00:48
Subject: Re: Feature freeze @ 7.0 branch

Sure Mikhail, and Mike.



On Jul 5, 2017, at 5:09 AM, Mikhail Khludnev <> wrote:
Is it worth to push fixes regression in
into 7.0?  

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Michael McCandless <> wrote:

Hi Anshum, I'd like to do for 7.0; it's
a simple rename, which I think we should do on major release.  I'll get a patch up shortly.


Mike McCandless

On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Anshum Gupta <> wrote:

Sure Ab, this is an important bug fix.


On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:35 AM Andrzej Białecki <> wrote:

SOLR-10878 and SOLR-10879 didn’t make it before the branches were cut, but I think they
should be included in 7x and 7_0 - I’m going to cherry-pick the commits from master.

On 3 Jul 2017, at 22:29, Anshum Gupta <> wrote:

I just wanted to call it out and remove any confusions around the fact that we shouldn’t
we committing ‘new features’ to branch_7_0. As far as whatever was already agreed upon
in previous communications, let’s get that stuff in if it’s ready or almost there. For
everything else, kindly check before you commit to the release branch.

Let us make sure that the bugs and edge cases are all taken care of, the deprecations, and
cleanups too.

P.S: Feel free to commit bug fixes without checking, but make sure that we aren’t hiding
features in those commits.



Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev

View raw message