lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Uwe Schindler" <...@thetaphi.de>
Subject RE: Release a 6.6.1
Date Mon, 21 Aug 2017 12:11:13 GMT
Hi,

 

Is there any interest to maybe get the Windows Shell scripts fixed, so they work with Java
9? Currently you cannot start Solr on Windows systems, as the version number checking and
the GC options are not working. It’s https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8689 - I
am just waiting for feedback and wanted to put it into 7.0. But if there is interest, I can
backport to 6.6, too (not yet planned).

 

Yesterday (before your mail), I already backported a Hadoop 2.7.2 -> 2.7.4 update, so it
works now with Java 9. This made the ugly workaround obsolete (changing java.version sysprop
temporarily). This fix is now in 6.6.1 and 7.0 branch.

 

Uwe

 

-----

Uwe Schindler

Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen

http://www.thetaphi.de <http://www.thetaphi.de/> 

eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de

 

From: Varun Thacker [mailto:varun@vthacker.in] 
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2017 12:49 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Release a 6.6.1

 

Hi Everyone,

 

Does anyone plan on committing any more fixes to the release branch? 

 

I've disabled SOLR-11247 for the branch so that we get a few Jenkins runs without any failures.


 

I plan on creating an RC in 12-14 hours time from now if all goes well 

 

On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Erick Erickson < <mailto:erickerickson@gmail.com>
erickerickson@gmail.com> wrote:

Uwe:

 

As far as I'm concerned, please do put both in. Varun is the RM and has final say of course.
He may be traveling though and be a little delayed responding.

 

Erick

 

On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 5:41 AM, Uwe Schindler < <mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de> uwe@thetaphi.de>
wrote:

Hi,

 

I just noticed, that our Hadoop friends released Hadoop 2.7.4. This fixes the stupid Java
9 bug in their static initializer (StringIndexOutOfBounds). So I’d like to also get  <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11261>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11261 in. If Jenkins is happy on 7.x and master,
this should be easy.

 

If you think it’s too risky (Hadoop 2.7.2 -> 2.7.4), we can live with the workaround
in Lucene 6.6.1! But the workaround is really hacky: It changes the “java.version” system
property temporarily on Java 9 while initializing Hadoop, which is not something you should
ever do!

 

Uwe

 

-----

Uwe Schindler

Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen

http://www.thetaphi.de <http://www.thetaphi.de/> 

eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de <mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de> 

 

From: Uwe Schindler [mailto: <mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de> uwe@thetaphi.de] 
Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2017 12:53 PM
To:  <mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org> dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Release a 6.6.1

 

Hi,

 

I need to backport SOLR-10966 to branch 6.6, otherwise Jenkins does not pass with Java 9.

 

Uwe

 

-----

Uwe Schindler

Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen

http://www.thetaphi.de <http://www.thetaphi.de/> 

eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de <mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de> 

 

From: Uwe Schindler [ <mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de> mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de] 
Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2017 12:00 AM
To:  <mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org> dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Release a 6.6.1

 

Hi,

I enabled Jenkins jobs on 👮. ASF was active already.

Uwe

Am 18. August 2017 23:34:23 MESZ schrieb Varun Thacker <varun@vthacker.in <mailto:varun@vthacker.in>
>:

>From the bug fixes in lucene 7.0 do we need to backport any of these issues :  LUCENE-7859
/ LUCENE-7871 / LUCENE-7914 ?

 

I plan on backporting these three Solr fixes on Sunday 

 

SOLR-10698

SOLR-10719

SOLR-11228

 

looking through the 7.0 bug fixes these two look important to get in as well :

 

SOLR-10983

SOLR-9262

 

So if no one get's to it I'll try backporting them as well 

 

Can someone please enable Jenkins on the branch again?

 

 

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Erick Erickson < <mailto:erickerickson@gmail.com>
erickerickson@gmail.com> wrote:

Right, that was the original note before we decided to backport a
bunch of other stuff and I decided it made no sense to omit this one.
All that has to happen is remove the " (note, not in 7.0, is in 7.1)"
bits since it's in 6.6, 6.x, 7.0, 7.1 and master.

Good catch!




On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Varun Thacker < <mailto:varun@vthacker.in> varun@vthacker.in>
wrote:
> Should I then go remove the note part from the CHANGES entry in branch_6_6 ?
>
> * SOLR-11177: CoreContainer.load needs to send lazily loaded core
> descriptors to the proper list rather than send
>   them all to the transient lists. (Erick Erickson) (note, not in 7.0, is in
> 7.1)
>
> I see a commit for this in branch_7_0
>
> Commit c73b5429b722b09b9353ec82627a35e2b864b823 in lucene-solr's branch
> refs/heads/branch_7_0 from Erick
> [  <https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=c73b542> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=c73b542
]
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Erick Erickson < <mailto:erickerickson@gmail.com>
erickerickson@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Well, it is in 7.0. Everything I moved to 6.6.1 is also in 7.0, or should
>> be.
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Varun Thacker < <mailto:varun@vthacker.in>
varun@vthacker.in> wrote:
>> > Hi Erick,
>> >
>> > I was going through the CHANGES file from the 6_6 branch and just
>> > curious
>> > why are we not planning on putting SOLR-11177 in 7.0 ?
>> >
>> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Erick Erickson
>> > < <mailto:erickerickson@gmail.com> erickerickson@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> OK, I'm done with my changes for 7.0, I think Varun might have a few
>> >> too.
>> >>
>> >> And things didn't melt down overnight so...
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Anshum Gupta < <mailto:anshum@anshumgupta.net>
anshum@anshumgupta.net>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > +1 on getting the fixes into 7.0 if you are confident with those, and
>> >> > if
>> >> > they are a part of 6.6.1.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks for taking care of this Erick.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:24 PM Erick Erickson
>> >> > < <mailto:erickerickson@gmail.com> erickerickson@gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> FYI:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I'll be backporting the following to SOLR 7.0 today:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> SOLR-11024: ParallelStream should set the StreamContext when
>> >> >> constructing SolrStreams:
>> >> >> SOLR-11177: CoreContainer.load needs to send lazily loaded core
>> >> >> descriptors to the proper list rather than send them all to the
>> >> >> transient lists.
>> >> >> SOLR-11122: Creating a core should write a core.properties file
>> >> >> first
>> >> >> and clean up on failure
>> >> >>
>> >> >> and those as well as several others to 6.6.1.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Since some of these depend on others, I need to add them in a
>> >> >> specific
>> >> >> order. I intend to run minimal tests for each JIRA before pushing,
>> >> >> then when they are all in place go through the full test cycle,
>> >> >> precommit and all that. I doubt that other than the flurry of commit
>> >> >> messages anyone will notice, at least if this stuff is as safe
to
>> >> >> backport as I believe people _better_ not.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> If these cause any serious problems for the 7.0 code line, feel
free
>> >> >> to back them out any time after today.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Why am I bothering the 7.0 code line? well, it's awkward to have
a
>> >> >> fix
>> >> >> in 6.6.1, skip 7.0 and have it show up again in 7.1. We can live
>> >> >> with
>> >> >> some thing not being in 7.0 if any of this causes disruptions
>> >> >> though.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Erick
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Erik Hatcher
>> >> >> < <mailto:erik.hatcher@gmail.com> erik.hatcher@gmail.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > Yes, I’m confident in that patch and its safety, thanks
Varun!
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Erik
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Aug 16, 2017, at 2:22 PM, Varun Thacker < <mailto:varun@vthacker.in>
varun@vthacker.in>
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > @Erik -If you are confident with the patch and if you think
it's
>> >> >> > safe
>> >> >> > then
>> >> >> > please go ahead and commit it. I'll try having a look at it
>> >> >> > tomorrow
>> >> >> > as
>> >> >> > well.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I will start back-porting issues which I am comfortable with.
If
>> >> >> > others
>> >> >> > can
>> >> >> > chime in as well it will be great.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I'll aim to cut an RC on Monday 21st August evening PST time
so
>> >> >> > everyone
>> >> >> > get's time to get the fixes in.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Any objections in the approach?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 4:56 AM, Erik Hatcher
>> >> >> > < <mailto:erik.hatcher@gmail.com> erik.hatcher@gmail.com>
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I’d like to get  <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10874>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10874
>> >> >> >> in
>> >> >> >> soon
>> >> >> >> as well.   Varun, if you’d like to take this one over
that’d be
>> >> >> >> fine
>> >> >> >> by
>> >> >> >> me
>> >> >> >> too ;) otherwise prod me back channel and I’ll get to
it.
>> >> >> >> Ideally I
>> >> >> >> should
>> >> >> >> have applied this one ages ago for 7.0, so maybe it can
make it
>> >> >> >> in
>> >> >> >> time
>> >> >> >> for
>> >> >> >> 6.6.1 and 7.0.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Erik
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Aug 14, 2017, at 5:51 PM, Varun Thacker < <mailto:varun@vthacker.in>
varun@vthacker.in>
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> From the change log of 6.7 / 7.0 and 7.1 the total count
of bug
>> >> >> >> fixes
>> >> >> >> under lucene and solr are
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Lucene : 7
>> >> >> >> Solr : 61
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I'd be happy to volunteer as a release manager for a bug
fix
>> >> >> >> 6.6.1
>> >> >> >> release
>> >> >> >> if others in the community think it's a good idea
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:  <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail:  <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:  <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail:  <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> >>
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:  <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org> dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail:  <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org> dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:  <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org> dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:  <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org> dev-help@lucene.apache.org

 


--
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen
https://www.thetaphi.de

 

 


Mime
View raw message