lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrzej Białecki <andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com>
Subject Re: Release a 6.6.1
Date Sat, 19 Aug 2017 12:13:35 GMT

> On 19 Aug 2017, at 11:24, Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> No that's the right branch. We tag releases from there.


Whew, thanks.


> 
> Uwe
> 
> Am 19. August 2017 09:48:08 MESZ schrieb "Andrzej Białecki" <andrzej.bialecki@lucidworks.com>:
> I accidentally pushed a back-port of SOLR-11221 to branch_6_6. This fix should go into
6.6.1 - so should I revert it from branch_6_6?
> 
>> On 18 Aug 2017, at 23:34, Varun Thacker <varun@vthacker.in <mailto:varun@vthacker.in>>
wrote:
>> 
>> From the bug fixes in lucene 7.0 do we need to backport any of these issues :  LUCENE-7859
/ LUCENE-7871 / LUCENE-7914 ?
>> 
>> I plan on backporting these three Solr fixes on Sunday 
>> 
>> SOLR-10698
>> SOLR-10719
>> SOLR-11228
>> 
>> looking through the 7.0 bug fixes these two look important to get in as well :
>> 
>> SOLR-10983
>> SOLR-9262
>> 
>> So if no one get's to it I'll try backporting them as well 
>> 
>> Can someone please enable Jenkins on the branch again?
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerickson@gmail.com <mailto:erickerickson@gmail.com>>
wrote:
>> Right, that was the original note before we decided to backport a
>> bunch of other stuff and I decided it made no sense to omit this one.
>> All that has to happen is remove the " (note, not in 7.0, is in 7.1)"
>> bits since it's in 6.6, 6.x, 7.0, 7.1 and master.
>> 
>> Good catch!
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Varun Thacker <varun@vthacker.in <mailto:varun@vthacker.in>>
wrote:
>> > Should I then go remove the note part from the CHANGES entry in branch_6_6 ?
>> >
>> > * SOLR-11177: CoreContainer.load needs to send lazily loaded core
>> > descriptors to the proper list rather than send
>> >   them all to the transient lists. (Erick Erickson) (note, not in 7.0, is in
>> > 7.1)
>> >
>> > I see a commit for this in branch_7_0
>> >
>> > Commit c73b5429b722b09b9353ec82627a35e2b864b823 in lucene-solr's branch
>> > refs/heads/branch_7_0 from Erick
>> > [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=c73b542 <https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=c73b542>
]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerickson@gmail.com
<mailto:erickerickson@gmail.com>>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Well, it is in 7.0. Everything I moved to 6.6.1 is also in 7.0, or should
>> >> be.
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Varun Thacker <varun@vthacker.in <mailto:varun@vthacker.in>>
wrote:
>> >> > Hi Erick,
>> >> >
>> >> > I was going through the CHANGES file from the 6_6 branch and just
>> >> > curious
>> >> > why are we not planning on putting SOLR-11177 in 7.0 ?
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Erick Erickson
>> >> > <erickerickson@gmail.com <mailto:erickerickson@gmail.com>>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> OK, I'm done with my changes for 7.0, I think Varun might have
a few
>> >> >> too.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> And things didn't melt down overnight so...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net
<mailto:anshum@anshumgupta.net>>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > +1 on getting the fixes into 7.0 if you are confident with
those, and
>> >> >> > if
>> >> >> > they are a part of 6.6.1.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks for taking care of this Erick.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:24 PM Erick Erickson
>> >> >> > <erickerickson@gmail.com <mailto:erickerickson@gmail.com>>
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> FYI:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I'll be backporting the following to SOLR 7.0 today:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> SOLR-11024: ParallelStream should set the StreamContext
when
>> >> >> >> constructing SolrStreams:
>> >> >> >> SOLR-11177: CoreContainer.load needs to send lazily loaded
core
>> >> >> >> descriptors to the proper list rather than send them all
to the
>> >> >> >> transient lists.
>> >> >> >> SOLR-11122: Creating a core should write a core.properties
file
>> >> >> >> first
>> >> >> >> and clean up on failure
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> and those as well as several others to 6.6.1.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Since some of these depend on others, I need to add them
in a
>> >> >> >> specific
>> >> >> >> order. I intend to run minimal tests for each JIRA before
pushing,
>> >> >> >> then when they are all in place go through the full test
cycle,
>> >> >> >> precommit and all that. I doubt that other than the flurry
of commit
>> >> >> >> messages anyone will notice, at least if this stuff is
as safe to
>> >> >> >> backport as I believe people _better_ not.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> If these cause any serious problems for the 7.0 code line,
feel free
>> >> >> >> to back them out any time after today.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Why am I bothering the 7.0 code line? well, it's awkward
to have a
>> >> >> >> fix
>> >> >> >> in 6.6.1, skip 7.0 and have it show up again in 7.1. We
can live
>> >> >> >> with
>> >> >> >> some thing not being in 7.0 if any of this causes disruptions
>> >> >> >> though.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Erick
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Erik Hatcher
>> >> >> >> <erik.hatcher@gmail.com <mailto:erik.hatcher@gmail.com>>
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> > Yes, I’m confident in that patch and its safety,
thanks Varun!
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Erik
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > On Aug 16, 2017, at 2:22 PM, Varun Thacker <varun@vthacker.in
<mailto:varun@vthacker.in>>
>> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > @Erik -If you are confident with the patch and if
you think it's
>> >> >> >> > safe
>> >> >> >> > then
>> >> >> >> > please go ahead and commit it. I'll try having a
look at it
>> >> >> >> > tomorrow
>> >> >> >> > as
>> >> >> >> > well.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > I will start back-porting issues which I am comfortable
with. If
>> >> >> >> > others
>> >> >> >> > can
>> >> >> >> > chime in as well it will be great.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > I'll aim to cut an RC on Monday 21st August evening
PST time so
>> >> >> >> > everyone
>> >> >> >> > get's time to get the fixes in.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Any objections in the approach?
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 4:56 AM, Erik Hatcher
>> >> >> >> > <erik.hatcher@gmail.com <mailto:erik.hatcher@gmail.com>>
>> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> I’d like to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10874
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10874>
>> >> >> >> >> in
>> >> >> >> >> soon
>> >> >> >> >> as well.   Varun, if you’d like to take this
one over that’d be
>> >> >> >> >> fine
>> >> >> >> >> by
>> >> >> >> >> me
>> >> >> >> >> too ;) otherwise prod me back channel and I’ll
get to it.
>> >> >> >> >> Ideally I
>> >> >> >> >> should
>> >> >> >> >> have applied this one ages ago for 7.0, so maybe
it can make it
>> >> >> >> >> in
>> >> >> >> >> time
>> >> >> >> >> for
>> >> >> >> >> 6.6.1 and 7.0.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Erik
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> On Aug 14, 2017, at 5:51 PM, Varun Thacker <varun@vthacker.in
<mailto:varun@vthacker.in>>
>> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> From the change log of 6.7 / 7.0 and 7.1 the
total count of bug
>> >> >> >> >> fixes
>> >> >> >> >> under lucene and solr are
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Lucene : 7
>> >> >> >> >> Solr : 61
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> I'd be happy to volunteer as a release manager
for a bug fix
>> >> >> >> >> 6.6.1
>> >> >> >> >> release
>> >> >> >> >> if others in the community think it's a good
idea
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
<mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
>> >> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
<mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
>> >>
>> >
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> --
> Uwe Schindler
> Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen
> https://www.thetaphi.de <https://www.thetaphi.de/>

Mime
View raw message