lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Noble Paul <noble.p...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 7.0 Release Update
Date Mon, 21 Aug 2017 06:10:52 GMT
There is a bug ishan has opened

SOLR-11268: AtomicUpdateProcessor complains missing UpdateLog

I have already talked to Anshum about it

On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
> Let's not commit more stuff to 7.0, unless it's a blocker as it gets hard to
> track.
> At this time, the only commits that would be going in to 7.0 are the ones
> that Varun spoke to me about back porting.
> Once that is done, I'll cut an RC (most likely tomorrow). In the meanwhile,
> I'll work on the release notes, and making sure that the CHANGES are good
> for 7.0.
>
> Anshum
>
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 8:33 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> <ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I've added SOLR-11183 to the release branch. Please let me know if someone
>> has any concerns.
>> Thanks,
>> Ishan
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Yonik Seeley <yseeley@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11262
>>> I don't know if it has implications for 7.0 or not.
>>>
>>> From the issue:
>>> """This means that any code using PushWriter (via MapWriter or
>>> IteratorWriter) will be broken if one tries to use XML response
>>> format. This may easily go unnoticed if one is not using XML response
>>> format in testing (JSON or binary is frequently used)."""
>>>
>>>
>>> -Yonik
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 5:14 AM, Noble Paul <noble.paul@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > sorry for the last minute notice. I need to fix the folowing as well.
>>> > It may take a few hours
>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11239
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 6:41 AM, Andrzej Białecki
>>> > <andrzej.bialecki@lucidworks.com> wrote:
>>> >> Then, if I may be so bold, I’d like to slip in SOLR-11235, which is
a
>>> >> simple
>>> >> AlreadyClosedException prevention fix. Patch is ready, tests are
>>> >> passing.
>>> >>
>>> >> On 14 Aug 2017, at 19:17, Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net>
wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks Ab.
>>> >>
>>> >> I'll cut an RC on Wednesday, so that both, I get the time, and also
>>> >> that the
>>> >> tests get some time on Jenkins.
>>> >>
>>> >> Anshum
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:29 AM Andrzej Białecki
>>> >> <andrzej.bialecki@lucidworks.com> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hi,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I’ve committed the fix for SOLR-11221 to branch_7_0 (and branch_7x
>>> >>> and
>>> >>> master).
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On 12 Aug 2017, at 02:20, Andrzej Białecki
>>> >>> <andrzej.bialecki@lucidworks.com> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hi Anshum,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> The patch for SOLR-11221 is ready, with one caveat - it required
>>> >>> larger
>>> >>> changes than I thought, so there’s a sizeable chunk of new code
that
>>> >>> is not
>>> >>> so well tested… I added a test that used to fail without this
change,
>>> >>> and
>>> >>> manual testing confirms that metrics are now correctly reported
after
>>> >>> core
>>> >>> reloads.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> We could postpone this fix to 7.0.1 if there are objections, but
I
>>> >>> think
>>> >>> it should go in to 7.0 - without the fix JMX reporting is surely
>>> >>> broken,
>>> >>> with the fix it’s only a possibility ;)
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On 11 Aug 2017, at 19:59, Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Thanks for the report Mark!
>>> >>>
>>> >>> and yes, I'll wait until the JMX issue is fixed.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Anshum
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 9:49 AM Mark Miller <markrmiller@gmail.com>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Yeah, let's not release a major version with JMX monitoring
broken.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Here is a 30 run test report for the 7.0 branch:
>>> >>>> http://apache-solr-7-0.bitballoon.com/20170811
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> - Mark
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:02 PM Tomas Fernandez Lobbe
>>> >>>> <tflobbe@apple.com>
>>> >>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Lets fix it before releasing. I’d hate to release with
a known
>>> >>>>> critical
>>> >>>>> bug.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> On Aug 10, 2017, at 12:54 PM, Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net>
>>> >>>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Hi Ab,
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> How quickly are we talking about? If you suggest, we could
wait,
>>> >>>>> depending upon the impact, and the time required to fix
it.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Anshum
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:28 PM Andrzej Białecki
>>> >>>>> <andrzej.bialecki@lucidworks.com> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> I just discovered SOLR-11221, which basically breaks
JMX
>>> >>>>>> monitoring. We
>>> >>>>>> could either release with “known issues” and then
quickly do
>>> >>>>>> 7.0.1, or wait
>>> >>>>>> until it’s fixed.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> On 10 Aug 2017, at 18:55, Mark Miller <markrmiller@gmail.com>
>>> >>>>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> I'll generate a test report for the 7.0 branch tonight
so we can
>>> >>>>>> evaluate that for an rc as well.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> - Mark
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 1:32 PM Anshum Gupta
>>> >>>>>> <anshum@anshumgupta.net>
>>> >>>>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> Good news!
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> I don't see any 'blockers' for 7.0 anymore, which
means, after
>>> >>>>>>> giving
>>> >>>>>>> Jenkins a couple of days, I'll cut out an RC. I
intend to do this
>>> >>>>>>> on
>>> >>>>>>> Wednesday/Thursday, unless a blocker comes up, which
I hope
>>> >>>>>>> shouldn't be the
>>> >>>>>>> case.
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> Anshum
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:02 PM Steve Rowe <sarowe@gmail.com>
>>> >>>>>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> I worked through the list of issues with the
>>> >>>>>>>> "numeric-tries-to-points” label and marked
those as 7.0 Blocker
>>> >>>>>>>> that seemed
>>> >>>>>>>> reasonable, on the assumption that we should
at a minimum give
>>> >>>>>>>> clear error
>>> >>>>>>>> messages for points non-compatibility.
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> If others don’t agree with the Blocker assessments
I’ve made,
>>> >>>>>>>> I’m
>>> >>>>>>>> willing to discuss on the issues.
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> I plan on starting to work on the remaining
7.0 blockers now.  I
>>> >>>>>>>> would welcome assistance in clearing them up.
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> Here’s a JIRA query to see just the remaining
7.0 blockers, of
>>> >>>>>>>> which
>>> >>>>>>>> there are currently 12:
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+in+(SOLR,LUCENE)+AND+fixVersion=7.0+AND+priority=Blocker+AND+resolution=Unresolved>
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> --
>>> >>>>>>>> Steve
>>> >>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> > On Jul 25, 2017, at 2:41 PM, Anshum Gupta
>>> >>>>>>>> > <anshum@anshumgupta.net>
>>> >>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>> >
>>> >>>>>>>> > I will *try* to get to it, but can't confirm.
If someone else
>>> >>>>>>>> > has a
>>> >>>>>>>> > spare cycle and can take it up before I
get to it, please do.
>>> >>>>>>>> >
>>> >>>>>>>> > -Anshum
>>> >>>>>>>> >
>>> >>>>>>>> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:44 AM Cassandra
Targett
>>> >>>>>>>> > <casstargett@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>> > I believe the only remaining blocker to
SOLR-10803 (to mark
>>> >>>>>>>> > all
>>> >>>>>>>> > Trie*
>>> >>>>>>>> > fields as deprecated) is SOLR-11023, which
Hoss was working
>>> >>>>>>>> > on. As
>>> >>>>>>>> > he
>>> >>>>>>>> > noted last night, he is off for vacation
for the next 2 weeks.
>>> >>>>>>>> > Is
>>> >>>>>>>> > anyone else available to work on it so
7.0 isn't stalled for
>>> >>>>>>>> > 2+
>>> >>>>>>>> > more
>>> >>>>>>>> > weeks?
>>> >>>>>>>> >
>>> >>>>>>>> > Now would also be a good time to look over
any other bugs with
>>> >>>>>>>> > PointFields and make a case if any should
be considered
>>> >>>>>>>> > blockers
>>> >>>>>>>> > for
>>> >>>>>>>> > 7.0. I think they all share a label:
>>> >>>>>>>> >
>>> >>>>>>>> >
>>> >>>>>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20numeric-tries-to-points
>>> >>>>>>>> >
>>> >>>>>>>> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Chris
Hostetter
>>> >>>>>>>> > <hossman_lucene@fucit.org> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>> > >
>>> >>>>>>>> > > : So, my overall point is that if
A) we agree that we want
>>> >>>>>>>> > > to
>>> >>>>>>>> > > deprecate
>>> >>>>>>>> > > : Trie* numeric fields, and B) we
want to hold up the 7.0
>>> >>>>>>>> > > release
>>> >>>>>>>> > > until
>>> >>>>>>>> > > : that's done, it's more than just
updating the example
>>> >>>>>>>> > > schemas
>>> >>>>>>>> > > if we
>>> >>>>>>>> > > : want to ensure a quality app for
users. We still need to
>>> >>>>>>>> > > fix
>>> >>>>>>>> > > the tests
>>> >>>>>>>> > > : and also fix bugs that are going
to be really painful for
>>> >>>>>>>> > > users. And
>>> >>>>>>>> > > : to get all that done soon, we definitely
need some more
>>> >>>>>>>> > > volunteers.
>>> >>>>>>>> > >
>>> >>>>>>>> > > I've beefed up the description of
SOLR-10807 with tips on
>>> >>>>>>>> > > how
>>> >>>>>>>> > > people can
>>> >>>>>>>> > > help out...
>>> >>>>>>>> > >
>>> >>>>>>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10807
>>> >>>>>>>> > >
>>> >>>>>>>> > >
>>> >>>>>>>> > >
>>> >>>>>>>> > > -Hoss
>>> >>>>>>>> > > http://www.lucidworks.com/
>>> >>>>>>>> > >
>>> >>>>>>>> > >
>>> >>>>>>>> > >
>>> >>>>>>>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>>>>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> >>>>>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>> >>>>>>>> > >
>>> >>>>>>>> >
>>> >>>>>>>> >
>>> >>>>>>>> >
>>> >>>>>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>>>>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> >>>>>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>> >>>>>>>> >
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> --
>>> >>>>>> - Mark
>>> >>>>>> about.me/markrmiller
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>> --
>>> >>>> - Mark
>>> >>>> about.me/markrmiller
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > -----------------------------------------------------
>>> > Noble Paul
>>> >
>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>> >
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>
>



-- 
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message